Forecasting Governor-Elect McCrory’s Infrastructure Funding Priorities

I recently came across this blog post from The Council of State Governments’ “Knowledge Center” blog.  The post forecasts the 2013 transportation funding challenges and priorities in 20 different states, North Carolina included.  Here’s what the post had to say about what might be expected once former Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory (R) becomes our governor in January:

The Associated Press recently looked at where incoming Gov. Pat McCrory (the longtime Charlotte Mayor) stands on transportation issues: “Don’t punish cities that must spend lots of money improving interstates, he says.  Develop decades-long construction plans.  Keep politics out of funding road projects and work with the private sector.  And don’t be afraid to try something risky, like the Republican did in 1998 by lobbying for a referendum by voters that raised the local sales tax to help build Charlotte’s first light rail line.”  Transportation advocates in the state are reportedly encouraged that the governor-elect, who championed transportation’s ability to improve the economy as Mayor of Charlotte, could endorse more sustainable transportation revenue sources and win support from legislators.  But, as a Business Journal article pointed out earlier this fall, North Carolina’s gas tax is already among the highest in the nation and while the state has turned to tolling to help finance some projects, they have faced challenges with a couple of toll road projects.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under State law, policy & news

N.C. Liens/Bonds, They Are A-Changin’ Part I: “Perfecting” Liens Under the New Regime

As 2012 draws to a close — faster than many of us can believe — the dawn of a new era under North Carolina’s mechanic’s lien and bond statutes quickly approaches.  And that means it’s high time for me to end my brief blogging hiatus with a series dedicated to helping construction industry participants throughout the state understand the changes that are rapidly coming down the pike.

By way of brief recap, legislation protecting general contractors from double payment liability on public projects and legislation protecting title insurers from “hidden liens” on private projects made splashy headlines this past summer.  I’ll be delving into the nuts and bolts of those significant changes as this series continues.  This post, however, is dedicated to addressing a less-publicized, but no less substantial, alteration to the lien law that every potential lien claimant will need to bear in mind in 2013, and beyond: the process by which lien rights are “perfected.”

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Feature story, Lien Law, State law, policy & news

The Surety’s Salvage Efforts: Equitable Subrogation v. Contractual Assignment Rights

It was an honor and pleasure to speak at last week’s surety and fidelity claims conference in Philadelphia hosted by the American Conference Institute.  Mark Oertel, a surety attorney from Los Angeles, and I closed out the conference on Thursday, October 18 with a presentation entitled “The Interplay Between Equitable Subrogation and the General Agreement of Indemnity’s Assignment Clause.”

Our remarks focused on two of the tools sureties use to minimize loss after satisfying claims made under payment and performance bonds.  One of those tools, equitable subrogation, allows the surety to step into the shoes and assert the rights of those entities to whom or on whose behalf the surety has performed or made payment.  That means after it performs its bond obligations, a surety becomes “subrogated” to the owner’s right to apply contract funds to completion costs, to the bond principal’s right to recover against poor-performing and/or late-performing subcontractors, and to the subs’ and suppliers’ rights to payment.  Since the courts have held that the surety’s equitable rights trump the rights of bankruptcy trustees, lenders and taxing authorities, equitable subrogation is undoubtedly the most powerful weapon in the surety’s salvage arsenal.

That’s MOST powerful.  Not ALL powerful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Equitable Subrogation, Indemnity Rights, Payment Bonds, Performance Bonds, Surety Law

Court of Appeals: Contractors’ Lien Claim Properly Dismissed Where “Owner” Owned Nothing on Date of 1st Furnishing

In a controversial 2-1 decision released October 2, 2012, the North Carolina Court of Appeals (“COA”) affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of a mechanic’s lien claim asserted by contractors who did not have a contract with the “Owner” of the improved real property as of the date of first furnishing — even though the “Owner” ultimately acquired title to the land during the course of the contractors’ performance.

Who is an "owner" under the mechanic's lien laws in North Carolina

Photo credit: tvland.com

The John Conner Construction, Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., Inc. decision is significant to the construction industry because it limits the reach of the term “Owner” as that term is used in North Carolina’s mechanic’s lien statutes.  Since there was one dissenting vote from the three-judge panel, however, the case is likely to be reviewed by the N.C. Supreme Court, which could elect to expand who qualifies as an “Owner” for the purposes of the lien law.

A full exploration of the facts, holding, dissent and practical implications of the John Conner Construction decision follows:

Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Feature story, Lien Law, NC case law, State law, policy & news

Barnstorming Tour on Revisions to North Carolina’s Lien and Bond Laws Kicks Off Tomorrow In Durham

I’m excited to be one of five North Carolina lawyers participating in a series of seminars sponsored by CarolinasAGC aimed at helping the construction industry understand the significant lien and bond revisions passed by the General Assembly and signed into law by Governor Perdue earlier this summer.

Over the coming weeks, CAGC is sponsoring five such seminars in Durham, Wilmington, Greensboro, Charlotte and Asheville.  CAGC’s website describes each seminar as follows:

This two hour seminar will cover the major, recently enacted revisions to North Carolina’s lien and public bond law statutes.  House Bill 1052 and Senate Bill 42 were signed into law this July, and will take effect respectively in January and April 2013.  The new laws substantially modify the steps that all parties will have to take to protect their interests — regardless of whether they are an owner, buyer, contractor or sub/supplier. In particular, the new laws impose significant new notice requirements for both public and private work.  This seminar will be taught by attorneys that were intimately involved in passing the legislation and will cover in detail what the changes are and what you’ll need to do to protect your interests starting in 2013.  Attendees will receive a written summary of the lien laws as amended and a copy of the Power Point
presentation presented and have ample opportunity to ask questions from the presenting attorneys.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Events, Lien Law, Payment Bonds, State law, policy & news, Surety Law

Bucking the Trend: The “Completed and Accepted Work Doctrine” Lives On In North Carolina

Image by eschipul via Creative Commons license.

In recent years, a majority of states have ruled that a contractor can be found liable for personal injuries suffered by third parties from accidents occurring after the contractor’s work is completed and accepted.

Not North Carolina.

In a decision handed down on August 7, 2012, the N.C. Court of Appeals (“COA”) once again embraced the “completed and accepted work doctrine,” which provides that an independent contractor is not liable for injuries to third parties occurring after the contractor’s work is completed and accepted.  The doctrine has been the “law of the land” in the Old North State since 1946, and our appellate courts show no signs of reversing course.

This post explores the COA’s decision in Lamb v. D.S. Duggins Welding, Inc., considers the merits and drawbacks of the completed and accepted work doctrine and concludes with some observations about the rule’s exceptions and limitations.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Construction Defects, Defect Claims, Feature story, NC case law, State law, policy & news

The Ties That Bind, and Those That Don’t: Subcontracts v. Sub-bids

I frequently receive phone calls from general contractors curious to know what their legal rights and obligations are with respect to subcontractors before a subcontract agreement is actually reached.  Invariably, these calls entail answering one of two questions:(1)  Can I sue a subcontractor who wants to back out of its sub-bid or estimate?  Or,

(2)  Am I obligated to use a subcontractor upon whose sub-bid or estimate I based my prime contract price?

Generally speaking, the answer to both questions is “No.”  That’s partially good news for subs, and partially good news for GC’s.  Here’s why.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under NC case law, Subcontractors

UPDATED: Lien Law Revisions Bill Cruises Through State Senate, Followed by “Hidden Lien” Legislation

Most recent update: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:22 p.m.Both the lien law revisions bill and the “hidden lien” legislation sought by the title insurance industry flew through the N.C. Senate yesterday with flying colors.

The lien law revisions bill (House Bill 1052), which among other things would (1) provide “double payment” protection for general contractors under North Carolina’s public payment bond statute and (2) permit subs and suppliers to serve a Notice of Claim of Lien Upon Funds even after a party above them in the contractual chain files for bankruptcy protection, passed unanimously 49-0, with one Senator not voting.

The bill was amended prior to the vote to remove treble damages liability for misrepresentations made in lien waivers.  I was listening to the Senate’s deliberations on the amendment, and Senators Brunstetter, Clodfelter, Tillman and Nesbitt all spoke about the dangers of introducing potential unfair and deceptive trade practices liability into a construction project’s payment cycle.   The amendment was unanimously approved by the House on Thursday, June 28.  The revised bill, as amended, can be found here.

The hidden lien legislation (Senate Bill 42), which among other things would require potential lien claimants to preserve their lien rights by providing a “Hi, I’m here” pre-notice to the project owner’s designated lien agent on residential and commercial projects, also passed unanimously 49-0, but not without some heartburn.  In particular, Senator Tommy Tucker of Waxhaw spoke about how the legislation was only before the General Assembly “under a veiled threat” by the title insurance industry, thereby representing a “you’d better!” bill that would leave subcontractors “holding the bag again.”  He expressed his support for the bill since the homebuilding industry supported it, but expressed his desire that the General Assembly re-visit the legislation early in the 2013 session to improve it before its April 1, 2013 effective date.

The version of SB 42 passed by the Senate contained several revisions to the version passed in the House on June 21.  In the intervening week, a group of construction industry stakeholders — yours truly included, in the interest of full disclosure — worked to propose several modifications that would remove some of the rough edges from the House-passed bill.  Those proposed modifications included the following:

  • The requirement of pre-notice will not apply where the improvements in question are to be made to an existing single-family residential dwelling unit that is used by the owner as a residence.
  • The failure to provide lien agent information to a supplier not expected to perform on-site labor will not result in triple damages exposure under North Carolina’s unfair and deceptive trade practices statute.
  • Higher tiered contractors will no longer be able to cut off the lien rights of lower tiered contractors through lien waivers once the lower tiered contractor (1) files pre-notice to the lien agent and (2) serves a notice of claim of lien upon funds up the entire contractual chain and upon the lien agent (under existing law, a higher tiered contractor’s ability to waive the rights of lower tier contractors is only shut off when the lower tiered contractor files a lien enforcement action in court).
  • Where a lien agent is not designated prior to the provision of design services by an architect or engineer, the design professional will be deemed to have met the requirement of pre-notice upon the owner’s designation of the lien agent.

These modifications and others are contained in a conference report that was adopted by both the House and Senate yesterday that you can find here.  Legislative action on the hidden lien bill is complete, subject to the bill potentially being “tweaked” early in the next legislative session.

Both bills are on their way to Governor Perdue for her approval, which is expected before the end of the month.

Many thanks to Representative Sarah Stevens of Mount Airy for reaching out to me yesterday with news of these developments, and for all of her efforts in shepherding these important bills to the finish line.

1 Comment

Filed under Lien Law, Payment Bonds, State law, policy & news, Surety Law

“Who Are You?” To Preserve Lien Rights Against Owners, Get the Right Answer to that Question!

Image courtesy Sam Killermann / samuelkillermann.com. Lyrics from “Who Are You” by P. Townshend (c) 1978.

I’m psyched to present another guest blogger this week: Lewis & Roberts construction & surety law associate extraordinaire, Jessica Bowers.  It’s been my distinct pleasure to work with Jessica since she joined L&R in October 2010.  Jess has represented owners, developers, GC’s and subs, and her practice has seen an increasing emphasis on serving the needs of surety companies.  A member of the State bar since 2005, Jess was a recipient of the bar’s Pro Bono Public Service Award that year.  

If you’re like me, you might find yourself softly singing the catchy chorus from the Who’s “Who Are You” as you consider the North Carolina Court of Appeals’ June 5, 2012 decision in Young & McQueen Grading Company, Inc. v. Mar-Comm & Assocs., Inc. et al.

The case involved a good deal of confusion regarding the correct identity of the owner of a construction project, confusion that complicated the contractor’s assertion of its mechanic’s lien rights against the owner’s property.

Rest easy, the contractor ended up prevailing and holding on to its lien rights.  But it sure wasn’t easy!  The decision reminds us how critical it is at the beginning of a project to determine the correct identity of the owner of the improvement by obtaining an accurate answer to one simple question:

Who are you?

Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Feature story, Lien Law, NC case law

BREAKING: Lien Bills Approved by House

Dave Simpson of Carolinas AGC informs me that HB 1052, the study commission’s lien law revision bill, as well as SB 42, the most recent version of the “hidden lien” legislation, were approved this afternoon by the House of Representatives of the North Carolina General Assembly.  Neither bill was amended prior to passage.

Senate action is still required before the bills reach Governor Purdue’s desk; I’ll keep you posted on developments.

Leave a comment

Filed under Lien Law, Payment Bonds, State law, policy & news, Surety Law