A Trap for 2nd-Tier Miller Act Claimants to Avoid

Wednesday WisdomMost second-tier Miller Act subs and suppliers understand that in order to recover under a prime contractor’s Miller Act payment bond, written notice of the claim must be made to the contractor “within 90 days from the date on which the person did or performed the last of the labor or furnished or supplied the last of the material for which the claim is made.”  40 U.S.C.A. § 3133(b)(2).  With that 90-day rule in mind, consider the following hypothetical:

You’re a second-tier supplier who last furnished materials to a first-tier subcontractor on a Fort Bragg project on December 13, 2013.  Today is the 89th day since your last furnishing, and you still haven’t been paid.  Realizing your claim notice deadline is fast approaching, you send your claim to the prime contractor by certified mail, return receipt requested this morning.  The prime will receive the notice and sign the green card on March 14, the 91st day after your last furnishing.  Was your notice of claim timely?

Sadly, no.

In Pepper Burns Insulation, Inc. v. Artco Corp., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a second-tier claimant’s Miller Act payment bond claim was barred because its pre-suit notice of claim was not actually received within the statute’s 90-day window.  970 F.2d 1340, 1341-42 (4th Cir. 1992).  Pepper Burns therefore established an actual receipt standard as opposed to a “mailbox rule” for complying with the 90-day notice requirement of the Miller Act.

Bottom line?  Don’t wait until the last minute to provide notice of claim under the federal Miller Act.  If you’re relying on the U.S. Postal Service, consider calendaring your deadline no more than 75 days after your last furnishing.  Why leave at least 15 days for receipt by the prime contractor?  Because the claimant’s notice in Pepper Burns was actually received 11 days after mailing!  In my book, a conservative approach is always best when it comes to complying with lien and bond notice requirements.

About these ads

3 Comments

Filed under Federal case law, Federal law, policy & news, Payment Bonds, Subcontractors, Surety Law

3 responses to “A Trap for 2nd-Tier Miller Act Claimants to Avoid

  1. Deadlines can be deadly, can’t they!?!. I’ve lost sleep over more than one deadline in my career, as I’m sure you have too. Just had to comment to say I LOVE your wise, hard-hat wearing owl.

    • Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.

      Thanks, Melissa! Yes, I spent part of a recent Sunday evening photo-shopping a hard-hat onto an image of an owl. Somehow that seems entirely normal. What’s wrong with me?

  2. Pingback: Prefer to Serve Your Own Lien & Bond Preliminary Notices? These Three Web Tools Can Help. | N.C. Construction Law, Policy & News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s